Dan2306
12-05-2010, 17:32
Hallo Leute,
der Zugriff auf meine .bib Datei scheint aus irgendeinem Grund nicht zu klappen. Es erscheint ständig die Meldung: citation on page ... undefined
Hier ein Minimalbeispiel:
\documentclass[twoside,12pt,a4paper]{report}%
\usepackage{natbib}
\usepackage{ae,hyperref,microtype}
\begin{document}
\noindent
\begin{flushleft}
{\small Pages 1--5 and 176--182 from:\\
Jens Michaelis, \emph{On Formal Properties of Minimalist Grammars},
Linguistics in Potsdam (LiP) 13,
Universit\"atsbibliothek, Publikationsstelle, Potsdam, 2001.}
\end{flushleft}
\vspace{7\topsep}\noindent
\textbf{\huge Chapter 1}
\vspace{3\topsep}\noindent
\textbf{\huge Preliminaries}
\vspace{3\topsep}\noindent
Research on natural language syntax in terms of transformational
grammar (TG) has been accompanied, since its beginning, by questions
on the complexity of the individual grammars legitimated by the
general linguistic theory. In this connection, from the perspective
of formal language theory, special emphasis has been placed on two
aspects: (a) where within the Chomsky hierarchy of classes of phrase
structure grammars, at least in terms of weak equivalence, are those
grammars located that are supposed to be adequate models for natural
languages, and (b) what is the complexity of the parsing problem for
such grammars? [\dots]
\section{Mild Context-Sensitivity}
Question (a) as raised in the introductory paragraph, initially, was
picked out as one of the central themes by Chomsky himself (see e.g.\cite{chomsky:56,chomsky:57,chomsky:59}). Subsequently, it nevertheless
became a topic of minor importance for theoretical linguists and, at
least for this reason, it remained an open problem for some time.
Then in \citealt{peters_ritchie:73} it was shown that it is possible to
generate each recursively enumerable set, and hence, especially, each
context-sensitive language, by some TG based on some context-free
skeleton. This means in any case that the TG-theory leaves
underspecified the complexity of natural languages in so far as each
recursively enumerable set provides a potential formal counterpart
for some natural language. The result of Peters and Ritchie
therefore conflicts in particular with the assumption, taken to be
plausible by various researchers, that his competence enables a
speaker to give a judgement on the grammaticality of arbitrary
sentences. That is to say, in terms of formal language theory, the
recognition problem for natural languages is assumed to be decidable.
\vspace{3\topsep}\noindent
[\dots]
\bibliographystyle{cslipubs-natbib}
\bibliography{lit}
\end{document}
Und hier dazugehörige .bib einträge:
@Article{peters_ritchie:73,
author = "Stanley Peters and Graeme Ritchie",
title = "On the generative power of Transformational grammars",
journal = "Information Sciences",
volume = "6",
pages = "49--84",
year = "1973"}
Ich weiß leider wirklich nicht, wo der Fehler liegt.
*Hilfe*
Dan
der Zugriff auf meine .bib Datei scheint aus irgendeinem Grund nicht zu klappen. Es erscheint ständig die Meldung: citation on page ... undefined
Hier ein Minimalbeispiel:
\documentclass[twoside,12pt,a4paper]{report}%
\usepackage{natbib}
\usepackage{ae,hyperref,microtype}
\begin{document}
\noindent
\begin{flushleft}
{\small Pages 1--5 and 176--182 from:\\
Jens Michaelis, \emph{On Formal Properties of Minimalist Grammars},
Linguistics in Potsdam (LiP) 13,
Universit\"atsbibliothek, Publikationsstelle, Potsdam, 2001.}
\end{flushleft}
\vspace{7\topsep}\noindent
\textbf{\huge Chapter 1}
\vspace{3\topsep}\noindent
\textbf{\huge Preliminaries}
\vspace{3\topsep}\noindent
Research on natural language syntax in terms of transformational
grammar (TG) has been accompanied, since its beginning, by questions
on the complexity of the individual grammars legitimated by the
general linguistic theory. In this connection, from the perspective
of formal language theory, special emphasis has been placed on two
aspects: (a) where within the Chomsky hierarchy of classes of phrase
structure grammars, at least in terms of weak equivalence, are those
grammars located that are supposed to be adequate models for natural
languages, and (b) what is the complexity of the parsing problem for
such grammars? [\dots]
\section{Mild Context-Sensitivity}
Question (a) as raised in the introductory paragraph, initially, was
picked out as one of the central themes by Chomsky himself (see e.g.\cite{chomsky:56,chomsky:57,chomsky:59}). Subsequently, it nevertheless
became a topic of minor importance for theoretical linguists and, at
least for this reason, it remained an open problem for some time.
Then in \citealt{peters_ritchie:73} it was shown that it is possible to
generate each recursively enumerable set, and hence, especially, each
context-sensitive language, by some TG based on some context-free
skeleton. This means in any case that the TG-theory leaves
underspecified the complexity of natural languages in so far as each
recursively enumerable set provides a potential formal counterpart
for some natural language. The result of Peters and Ritchie
therefore conflicts in particular with the assumption, taken to be
plausible by various researchers, that his competence enables a
speaker to give a judgement on the grammaticality of arbitrary
sentences. That is to say, in terms of formal language theory, the
recognition problem for natural languages is assumed to be decidable.
\vspace{3\topsep}\noindent
[\dots]
\bibliographystyle{cslipubs-natbib}
\bibliography{lit}
\end{document}
Und hier dazugehörige .bib einträge:
@Article{peters_ritchie:73,
author = "Stanley Peters and Graeme Ritchie",
title = "On the generative power of Transformational grammars",
journal = "Information Sciences",
volume = "6",
pages = "49--84",
year = "1973"}
Ich weiß leider wirklich nicht, wo der Fehler liegt.
*Hilfe*
Dan